Thalassemia is a hereditary hemoglobinopathies that results from the absence of a globulin chain and it is a very common problem in Southeast Asia. Like many other countries’ community based premarital carrier screening (PMCS) of thalassemia is extremely rare in Bangladesh. This study aimed to investigate knowledge, attitude, practice, and awareness towards PMCS among University students in Bangladesh. A cross-sectional study was conducted from January to March 2020 using a self-administered questionnaire which was distributed to 911 Jahangirnagar University students aged 18 to 24. The questionnaire was composed of five parts: personal information, knowledge, attitudes, practice, and awareness. On the basis of the answers, knowledge, attitudes, practice, and awareness towards PMCS were evaluated. About (88.80%) of the total participating students thought that PMCS is necessary before marriage. In the case of thalassemia carrier parents, 81.00% of students replied that prenatal screening is important before pregnancy. 610 students (66.95%) of the total 911 students considered that thalassemia can be caused by marrying between blood relatives. Most of the students (79.80%) supported that thalassemia screening should be an obligatory procedure and 91.98% would like to raise social awareness about PMCS and thalassemia. The students of Jahangirnagar University have good knowledge about PMCS program and a positive attitude but it is difficult to implement in real life without continuing practice. The outcome of this study suggested the necessity of increasing student’s awareness of Bangladeshi PMCS program.


Download data is not yet available.


Genetic blood disorders are considered to be the most common causes of physical and mental disabilities in infants and children [1]. Sickle cell anemia and thalassemia —are the most common genetic hemoglobinopathies worldwide [2]. World Health Organization (WHO) accorded that, the prevalence rate of the sickle cell trait was 6% and 2% for beta-thalassemia trait and around 240 million people are carriers for these genetic disorders [3], [4].

Thalassemia is a hereditary hemoglobinopathies that results from the absence of globulin polypeptide chain synthesis [5]. This is a very common problem in Southeast Asia. Thalassemia is classified into two types, a) thalassemia major and b) thalassemia minor [6]. The disease is inherited in children if one of the parents becomes a carrier of this hemoglobin gene. If both parents are carriers, they have a 25% chance of having a thalassemia major child and a 50% chance of having children with thalassemia minor [7]. Birth of thalassemia major child can only be prevented by knowing which persons are carriers of thalassemia and avoiding marriage between carriers. Thalassemia is likely to be a major public health concern in the coming decades in South Asia. Despite the fact that Bangladesh lies in the world’s thalassemia belt, information on the number of thalassemia carriers, and different aspects (epidemiology, clinical course, mortality, complications, and treatment outcomes) of thalassemia carriers are lacking. So, screening and counseling programs are cost-effective preventative measures that decrease the prevalence of thalassemia.

The proper management of thalassemia requires a multidisciplinary approach such as identifying carriers, providing treatment knowing the molecular heterogeneity of thalassemia with clinical correlations, and transfusing only RBCs instead of whole blood etc. Like, other South Asian countries, Bangladesh has no national programs for raising awareness, screening carriers, or knowing patients with thalassemia [8]–[12].

As an alternative approach to reducing thalassemia prevalence in Bangladesh, this study was conducted to evaluate the knowledge, attitude, practices, and awareness about thalassemia among students of the biological faculty, Jahangirnagar University.

Materials and Methods

This is a cross-sectional descriptive study carried out among the students of biological faculty, Jahangirnagar University. The study was conducted during the period from 15 January 2020 to 15 March 2020. A total of 911 students took part to achieve the objectives of this study. Selection of the participants was done by simple random sampling among students of biological faculty, age range were 18 to 24. All potential participants received an information sheet that covered all aspects of the study and their inquiries were responded to and were asked to sign a consent form. A self-administered questionnaire was prepared by literature review and used to collect the data under the supervision of qualified students [13]–[16]. Based on available literature on Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice (KAP) paradigm on thalassemia, the questions were set in the questionnaire. The questionnaire included close-ended questions. Close-ended questions, in a checklist format, were designed to investigate people’s knowledge of thalassemia.

The questionnaire was composed of five main parts: personal information, knowledge, attitudes, practice, and awareness. The first part includes personal information concerned about age, sex, name of the department, academic year, home district, marital status, religion, individual history of thalassemia, and family history of thalassemia. The second part was concerned with the knowledge of thalassemia. For example, we asked the participants if there was any connection of this disease with marriage. In the third part, attitudes towards thalassemia will help us to know the mindset of the participants about thalassemia. For example, the participants were asked about their willingness to marry a thalassemia carrier, if he/she (the carrier) fulfills all other criteria to get married. The fourth part justifies their practice towards thalassemia such as willingness to test thalassemia before marriage. The final part was concerned about their awareness of thalassemia.

Statistical Analysis

To evaluate the statistical significance of differences among proportions of categorical data Pearson’s Chi-square analyses were used. The odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) obtained from logistic regression models were taken. All statistical analyses were conducted using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS 20.0) [17].

Ethical Clearance

The study was approved by the Jahangirnagar University Ethics Committee. Participation was voluntary and written informed consent was obtained prior to data collection. All participants were informed about their right to withdraw from the study at any time and their anonymity and confidentiality were assured and emphasized.


A total of 911 students of the biological faculty of Jahangirnagar University participated in this pre-KAP study. Among them 431 were male and 480 were female students. The age range of the participants was 18 to 24 years. Most of the male students (88.16%) reported that they have no history of thalassemia and in female students, this was 83.75%. In the case of family history of thalassemia, 85.83% (P = 0.023) of the participants reported that they have no family history of thalassemia, and 88.16% and 83.75% for male and female students, respectively.

Though the majority of the participants (701 among 911 participants, 76.94%) answered they have no known person suffering from thalassemia disease, a large participant (191 among 911, 20.96%) do know some thalassemia patients who are mostly neighbors (3.95%) (Table I).

History n% P-value
Total Male (n = 431) Female (n = 480)
Q: Individual history of thalassemia
 Yes 12 (1.31) 8 (1.85) 4 (0.83) 0.023
 No 782 (85.83) 380 (88.16) 402 (83.75)
 Don’t know 117 (12.84) 43 (9.97) 74(15.41)
Q: Family history of thalassemia
 Yes 12 (1.31) 4 (0.92) 8 (1.66) 0.146
 No 782 (85.83) 380 (88.16) 402 (83.75)
 Don’t know 117 (12.84) 47 (10.90) 70 (14.58)
Q: Do you know any thalassemia patients?
 Yes 191 (20.96) 92 (21.34) 99 (20.62) <0.001
 No 701 (76.94) 320 (74.24) 381 (79.37)
 Don’t know 19 (2.08) 19 (4.40) 0 (0)
Q: What is your relationship with the patients?
 Parents 14 (1.53) 9 (2.08) 5 (1.04) 0.473
 Cousins 21 (2.30) 11 (2.55) 10 (2.08)
 Neighbors 36 (3.95) 15 (3.48) 21(4.37)
 No relation 624 (68.49) 330 (76.56) 294 (61.25)
Table I. Thalassemia History of the Participants (Both Personal & Family History) Who Participated (N = 911) in this Study

The knowledge about thalassemia among the participants was evaluated under two headings: i) general knowledge about thalassemia such as is thalassemia a familiar word or not, major and minor forms of thalassemia, signs and symptoms of thalassemia, is this disease linked with marriage or not, etc., and ii) knowledge dealing with diagnosis and treatment of thalassemia.

Among the participants, 869 participants (95.40%) had heard the term thalassemia and among the rest 42 (4.60%), 19 participants (2.08%) had never heard the term thalassemia and 23 participants (2.52%) had no idea. Though 95.40% of the participants have heard the term thalassemia, a number of participants (109 among 911, 11.96%) do not know that thalassemia is a blood disorder. Almost half of the participants (382 among 911, 41.93%) answered that either they did not know such types of forms of thalassemia or they did not have any idea about the thalassemia major and minor forms. On the other hand, 239 participants (26.23%) also did not know that thalassemia disease has a connection with marriage.

These statistics of knowledge about thalassemia clearly show a great percentage of biological science students at a University do not know how to avoid the future occurrence of thalassemia.

Among the 911, 613 participants (67.28%) considered that thalassemia can be diagnosed but the idea of thalassemia treatment was mostly unknown (604 participants, 66.30%). Most of the students (64.21%) answered that thalassemia is a hereditary disease while 5.48% answered that it is an autoimmune disease.

Little more than half of the population (59.05%) answered that blood transfusion is the main treatment of thalassemia and the rest (34.13%) gave negative answers and 6.80% of participants had no idea (Table III). Among the total participants, 47.09% considered that the signs and symptoms of thalassemia were pale skin and dark urine, 34.68% considered muscle weakness, and the rest (2.96%) considered headache and diarrhea (Table II).

Knowledge items(General) n% P-value
Total Male (n = 431) Female (n = 480)
Q: Have you heard the term thalassemia?
 Yes 869 (95.40) 413 (95.82) 456 (95) 0.836
 No 19 (2.08) 8 (1.85) 11 (2.29)
 Don’t know 23 (2.52) 10 (2.32) 13 (2.70)
Q: Is thalassemia a blood disorder?
 Yes 730 (80.13) 331 (76.79) 399 (83.12) 0.001
 No 109 (11.96) 51 (11.83) 58 (12.08)
 Don’t know 72 (7.90) 49 (11.36) 23 (4.79)
Q: Do you know thalassemia major is the disease form and thalassemia minor is the carrier form?
 Yes 529 (58.06) 241 (55.91) 288 (60) 0.671
 No 288 (31.61) 147 (34.10) 141 (29.37)
 Don’t Know 94 (10.31) 43 (9.97) 51 (10.62)
Q: Is there any connection to this disease with marriage?
 Yes 672 (73.76) 329 (76.33) 343 (71.45) 0.005
 No 185 (20.30) 70 (16.24) 11 (23.95)
 Don’t Know 54 (5.92) 32 (7.42) 22 (4.58)
Q: What are the signs and symptoms of thalassemia?
 Pale skin and dark urine 429 (47.09) 244 (56.61) 185 (38.54) 0.777
 Muscle weakness 316 (34.68) 173 (40.13) 123 (25.62)
 Headache and diarrhea 27 (2.96) 14 (3.24) 13 (2.70)
Table II. General Knowledge about Thalassemia among the Students (N = 911) of the Biological Faculty of Jahangirnagar University
Knowledge items(diagnosis & treatment) n% P-value
Total Male (n = 431) Female (n = 480)
Q: Do you know thalassemia can be diagnosed?
 Yes 613 (67.28) 293 (67.98) 320 (66.66) 0.019
 No 246 (27.00) 123 (28.59) 123 (25.62)
 Don’t know 52 (5.70) 15 (3.48) 37 (7.70)
Q: Do you know the treatment of thalassemia?
 Yes 270 (29.63) 142 (32.94) 128 (26.66) 0.116
 No 604 (66.30) 272 (63.10) 332 (69.16)
 Don’t know 37 (4.06) 17 (3.94) 20 (4.16)
Q: Do you know blood transfusion is the main treatment of thalassemia?
 Yes 538 (59.05) 253 (58.70) 285 (59.37) 0.972
 No 311 (34.13) 148 (34.33) 163 (33.95)
 Don’t know 62 (6.80) 30 (6.96) 32 (6.66)
Q: Do you know the type of thalassemia?
 Hereditary 585 (64.21) 255 (59.16) 330 (68.75) 0.123
 Autoimmune 50 (5.48) 15 (3.48) 35 (7.29)
Table III. Knowledge Dealing with Diagnosis and Treatment of Thalassemia among the Students (N = 911) of the Biological Faculty of Jahangirnagar University

Next, we tried to focus on the attitudes of the participants toward thalassemia. Most of the participants (800 among 911, 87.81%) (P = 0.008) did not want to marry thalassemia carrier and 809 among 911 (88.80%) (P = 0.007) significantly thought that thalassemia screening is necessary before marriage.

In the case of prenatal screening of neonates, 81.00% of participants (P = <0.001) significantly replied that prenatal screening is important before the late stage of pregnancy if parents are thalassemia carriers. They (91.98%) would like to raise social awareness about thalassemia. Among the total study population, 595 (65.31%) participants would like to give birth if the neonates are even affected by thalassemia though 220 (24.14%) participants will consider aborting the pregnancy.

Table V reports the practice of the participants with thalassemia. Most of the test population (92.09%) (P = 0.086) wanted to test thalassemia before marriage. About 89.68% of the participants wanted to suggest others perform prenatal screening. Even they (79.80%) (P = <0.001) significantly thought that thalassemia should be obligatory before marriage while 8.45% of participants were neutral and 11.74% disagreed with making this obligatory. More than 90% of the participants (91.43%) of this study wanted to inform other persons about its consequences. A very positive event was observed in the case of blood donation to thalassemia patients, most of the study population (80.79%) (P = 0.002) wanted to donate blood and 88.47% of the participants wanted to encourage others to give blood to thalassemia patient.

Attitudes n% P-value
Total Male (n = 431) Female (n = 480)
Q: Do you like to marry a thalassemia carrier?
 Yes 77 (8.45) 47 (10.90) 30 (6.25) 0.008
 No 800 (87.81) 373 (86.54) 427 (88.95)
 Don’t know 34 (3.73) 11 (2.55) 23 (4.79)
Q: Do you think that thalassemia screening is necessary before marriage?
 Yes 809 (88.80) 377 (87.47) 432 (90.0) 0.007
 No 60 (6.58) 39 (9.04) 21 (4.37)
 Don’t know 42 (4.61) 15 (3.48) 27 (5.62)
Q: After screening if you find that you are thalassemia carrier or minor, do you like to marry a thalassemia carrier partner?
 Yes 136 (14.92) 80 (18.56) 56 (11.66) 0.008
 No 718 (78.81) 329 (76.33) 389 (81.04)
 Don’t know 57 (6.25) 22 (5.10) 35 (7.29)
Q: Do you think prenatal screening of the neonates is important in pregnancy, if parents are thalassemia carriers?
 Yes 738 (81.00) 329 (76.33) 409 (85.20) <0.001
 No 112 (12.29) 73 (16.93) 39 (8.12)
 Don’t know 61 (6.69) 29 (6.72) 32 (6.66)
Q: Is it important to raise social awareness for thalassemia?
 Yes 838 (91.98) 398 (92.34) 440 (91.66) 0.260
 No 20 (2.91) 6 (1.39) 14 (2.91)
 Don’t know 53 (5.81) 27 (6.26) 26 (5.41)
Q: What should you do when you find out that neonatal is thalassemia affected after screening?
 Give birth 595 (65.31) 291 (67.51) 304 (63.33) 0.678
 Abortion 220 (24.14) 104 (24.12) 116 (24.16)
Table IV. Attitudes of the Participants (N = 911) of the Biological Faculty, Jahangirnagar University, Towards Thalassemia
Practice n% P-value
Total Male (n = 431) Female (n = 480)
Q: Do you want to test thalassemia before marriage?
 Yes 839 (92.09) 395 (91.64) 444 (92.50)
 No 43 (4.72) 26 (6.03) 17 (3.54) 0.086
 Don’t know 29 (3.18) 10 (2.32) 19 (3.95)
Q: Will you suggest others to perform prenatal screening?
 Yes 817 (89.68) 379 (87.93) 438 (91.25)
 No 39 (4.28) 26 (6.03) 13 (2.70) 0.046
 Don’t know 55 (6.03) 26 (6.03) 29 (6.04)
Q: Will you suggest others perform prenatal screening if parents are carriers?
 Yes 799 (87.70) 372 (86.31) 427 (88.95)
 No 61 (6.69) 40 (9.28) 21 (4,37) 0.005
 Don’t know 51 (5.59) 19 (4.40) 32 (6.66)
Q: Do you think that screening for thalassemia should be obligatory producer before marriage?
 Yes 727 (79.80) 322 (74.71) 405 (84.37)
 No 107 (11.74) 73 (16.93) 34 (7.08) <0.001
 Don’t know 77 (8.45) 36 (8.35) 41 (8.54)
Q: Do you think you should inform other people about its consequences?
 Yes 833 (91.43) 384 (89.09) 449 (93.54)
 No 27 (2.96) 15 (3.48) 12 (2.5) 0.047
 Don’t know 51 (5.59) 32 (7.42) 19 (3.95)
Q: Do you want to donate blood to thalassemia patient?
 Yes 736 (80.79) 334 (77.49) 402 (83.75)
 No 102 (11.19) 48 (11.13) 54 (11.25) 0.002
 Don’t know 73 (8.01) 49 (11.36) 24 (5.0)
Q: Will you encourage others to give blood to thalassemia patients?
 Yes 806 (88.47) 376 (87.23) 430 (89.58)
 No 48 (5.26) 26 (6.03) 22 (4.58) 0.512
 Don’t know 57 (6.25) 29 (6.72) 28 (5.83)
Table V. Practice of the Participants (N = 911) of the Biological Faculty, Jahangirnagar University, about Thalassemia

About three-fourths (80.13%) of the study population considered thalassemia to be a blood disorder and 11.96% had no idea about it (Table II). Over half of the students (67.83%) reported that it is not caused by malnutrition but about 22.06% of the participants considered it as a malnutritional disease (Table VI).

Awareness n% P-value
Total Male (n = 431) Female (n = 480)
Q: Is thalassemia caused by malnutrition?
 Yes 201 (22.06) 103 (23.89) 98 (20.41)
 No 618 (67.83) 281 (65.19) 337 (70.20) 0.271
 Don’t know 92 (10.09) 47 (10.90) 45 (9.37)
Q: Can thalassemia be caused by marrying between blood relatives?
 Yes 610 (66.95) 297 (68.90) 313 (65.20)
 No 229 (25.13) 94 (21.80) 135 (28.12) 0.049
 Don’t know 72 (7.90) 40 (9.28) 32 (6.66)
Q: Are blood tests required for diagnosis of thalassemia?
 Yes 808 (88.69) 378 (87.70) 430 (89.58)
 No 48 (5.26) 25 (5.80) 23 (4.79) 0.665
 Don’t know 55 (6.03) 28 (6.49) 27 (5.62)
Q: Do you think that thalassemia patients need blood transfusions throughout his/her life?
 Yes 725 (79.58) 337 (78.19) 388 (80.83)
 No 117 (12.84) 59 (13.68) 58 (12.08) 0.613
 Don’t know 69 (7.57) 35 (8.12) 34 (7.08)
Table VI. Awareness of the Participants (N = 911) of Biological Faculty, Jahangirnagar University, about Thalassemia

610 among 911 (66.95%) (P = 0.049) students significantly thought that thalassemia can be caused by marrying between blood relatives and 7.90% were neutral. About 88.69% of the participants answered blood tests are required for diagnosis of thalassemia. Three-fourths (79.58%) of the total participants thought that blood transfusion is necessary throughout the life of a thalassemia patient, while 12.84% of the participants did not know about it and 7.57% were neutral in this case (Table VI).


Hereditary or communicable disease carrier detection is important to control prevalence and this is an acceptable international practice [18]. The application of PMCS is likely to bear enormous benefits in coping with the burden of congenital and inheritable genetic diseases. In highly consanguineous populations, it is one of the most suggested effective prevention strategies [19]. In any program of premarital screening, special focus is given to unmarried young people such as University students because their knowledge, beliefs, and attitudes will help them to choose their life partner [20]. In this connection, a large number of students choose their life partners during their study in the University. Therefore, University students have been chosen for this Pre-KAP (knowledge, attitudes, and practice) study towards PMCS program of thalassemia, and to the best of our knowledge, it is the first University level PMCS program in Bangladesh.

In our study, most of the students said that they had no individual history or family history of thalassemia. Most of the respondents (95.38%) had heard the term thalassemia as compared to other thalassemia prevalent countries such as Malaysia (~87%), Italy (85%), Greece (95%), Bahrain (65%), Turkey (58%) and Saudi Arabia (48%) [21]–[24] but only 58.06% students knew about the type of thalassemia major is the diseased form and minor is the carrier form (Table II). Though it is a positive sign that about three-fourths of the students (73.76%) knew this disease is connected with marriage but a little more than one-fourth (26.24%) had no idea about the occurrence of thalassemia with marriage which is also a matter of great concern.

Another important issue is that 11.96% even do not know that thalassemia is a blood disorder (Table II). About 80.13% of participants recognized that thalassemia is a blood disorder (Table II), which was more than shown by Basu at Kolkata (67.52%) [25], Srivastava et al. at rural Bengal (50.67) [26] and Wong et al. at Malaysia among multi-racial population (76.4%) [27]. About 67.28% of participants answered that thalassemia can be diagnosed but most of the students (66.30%) had no idea about its treatment. Results showed that 311 out of 911 participants (34.13%) confirmed that they do not know that blood transfusion is the only treatment for thalassemia which is also not enough for the survival of the patients (Table III). One of the most concerning findings of this study and some previous studies was that many of the respondents were unaware of the genetic nature of this disease. Our study demonstrated that 64.21% of respondents had correct knowledge about the inherited/genetic nature of this disease (Table III) and only 5.48% considered it an autoimmune disease while this percentage was found higher in some other previous studies [22], [24]–[27]. Here, it is worth mentioning that in another study in Bangladesh, Hossain et al. found about 56.0% of the participants do not know about the inherited/genetic nature of this disease [24]. The reason behind this high percentage is that their target group of participants was college students who might not come through the knowledge of thalassemia occurring.

About 88.80% of participants had a positive attitude to have premarital testing/screening of blood for thalassemia (Table IV). This particular finding was also found to be higher in other cities or countries like Bahrin (77.8%) [23], Kolkata (92.06%) [25], Malaysia (90.6%) [27], Sri Lanka (82%) [28] and Karachi (74%) [29]. Most of the participants (91.98%) thought that raising social awareness about thalassemia is very important. Only 24.14% agreed for opting termination of pregnancy in the case of thalassemic fetus rather than letting the child suffer (Table IV). In contrast, in most other previous studies it was 81.31% at Kolkata [25], 88.0% at Thailand [30], 36.6% at Malaysia [27], but only 2.2% at Karachi [29].

In this study, we found most of the participants (89.68%) had wanted prenatal diagnosis for thalassemia which was higher than Malaysia (13.6%) [27], Sri Lanka (17.0%) [28], and Karachi (35.9%) [29]. This high percentage (89.68%) of participants willing to have a prenatal diagnosis for thalassemia might be due to the fact that all of the participants are University students of biology background. They might be aware of the outcome when a baby is born with thalassemia disease. This is also reflected in their answers when they are asked to test thalassemia before marriage. 839 out of 911 participants (92.09%) answered that they want to know if they are carriers of this disease or not before marriage (Table V). Therefore, making PMCS an obligatory procedure before marriage was favored by about 79.80% of the participants. This percentage is lower than what was found in Saudi Arabia where 85.0% agreed on making PMCS a mandatory procedure before marriage and 63.0% agreed on legal interference in case of a positive result [30]. Maximum (91.43%) students agreed to inform others about the consequences of thalassemia. In our study, 80.79% of participants wanted to donate blood and 88.47% encouraged others to donate blood for thalassemia patients in contrast to 98.83% in Kolkata [25], 97.1% in Karachi [29] and 60.8% in Bangladesh in another study on college students [24]. It was found that thalassemia could be caused by marrying between blood relatives was assumed by 66.95% of participants (Table VI). Surprisingly, only 79.58% were aware that blood transfusion is required throughout life in the present study (Table VI) compared to 66.59% by Basu at Kolkata [25], 42.1% by Ebrahim et al. at Karachi [29], 47.9% by Wong et al. at Malaysia [27] and 33.9% by Hajeri et al. at Bahrin [23] among the general public.


The current study was performed only in one faculty of Jahangirnagar University and the results may not be represented in other regions of the country. However, this study showed that students of biological faculty from Jahangirnagar University have good knowledge about PMCS program and a positive attitude towards the program but it is difficult to implement in real life without continuing practice. The findings of this study highlight the necessity to increase student’s awareness and enhance their knowledge and attitudes toward Bangladeshi PMS program. Various media of communication such as TV, radio, newspaper, and social platforms can be used to circulate essential information about the PMCS program among the target population. Community based awareness campaigns should be performed. Religious leaders and lawmakers can play an important role in raising compliance and exercise of the PMCS program. For the performance of premarital and prenatal diagnosis, diagnostic centers can be increased to provide quality control programs at a minimum cost or free of cost to the poor. Overall, this study will be considerably helpful in preventing the propagation of thalassemia in resource-limited countries like Bangladesh.


  1. A study on knowledge, attitude and practice about thalassemia among general population in out-patient department at a tertiary care hospital of Kolkata. (2015). J Prev Med Holistic Health, 1, 6-13.
     Google Scholar
  2. A study on knowledge, attitude, and practice towards premarital carrier screening among adults attending primary healthcare centers in a region in Oman. (2014). BMC Public Health, 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-380
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  3. Acceptance of premarital health counseling in Riyadh city, 1417H. (2000). J Family Commun Med, 7, 27-34.
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  4. Attitudes to premarital counseling among students of Abha Health Sciences College. (2002). Saudi Med J, 23.
     Google Scholar
  5. Awareness among parents of β-thalassemia major patients, regarding prenatal diagnosis and premarital screening. (2012). J Coll Physicians Surg Pak, 22.
     Google Scholar
  6. Burden of thalassemia in India: the road map for control. (2017). Pediatr Hematol Oncol J, 2, 79-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phoj.2017.10.002
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  7. Campaign to control genetic blood diseases in Bahrain. (2005). Commun Genet, 8. https://doi.org/10.1159/000083340
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  8. Genetic blood disorders survey in the sultanate of Oman. (2003). J Trop Pediatr, 49, i1-20.
     Google Scholar
  9. Genetic Disorders among Arab Populations. (2010). Springer.
     Google Scholar
  10. Harrison’s Principles of Internal Medicine. (2015). McGraw-Hill Education.
     Google Scholar
  11. Hereditary anaemias: genetic basis, clinical features, diagnosis, and treatment. (1982). Bull World Health Organ, 60.
     Google Scholar
  12. Knowledge and attitude of pregnant women at risk for having a fetus with severe thalassemia after genetic counseling at Srinagarind Hospital. (2011). Thai J Obstet Gynaecol, 19.
     Google Scholar
  13. Knowledge and attitude toward the hemoglobinopathies premarital screening program in Saudi Arabia: population-based survey. (2008). Hemoglobin, 32. https://doi.org/10.1080/03630260802508384
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  14. Knowledge and beliefs regarding thalassemia in an urban population. (2019). Cureus, 11. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.5268
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  15. Knowledge, attitude and practice study of beta-thalassemia in rural Bengal. (2011). Genet Clin, 4.
     Google Scholar
  16. Knowledge, attitude and practices (KAP) of the families of B-thalassemia patients in a thalassemia center of Karachi. (2020). Int J Curr Med Pharm Res, 6. https://doi.org/10.24327/23956429.ijcmpr202002844
     Google Scholar
  17. Knowledge, belifes and behavior intention about premarital screening among King Saud University female students in Riyadh. (2014). Sch J Appl Med Sci, 2.
     Google Scholar
  18. Lack of knowledge and misperceptions about thalassaemia among college students in Bangladesh: a cross-sectional baseline study. (2020). Orphanet J Rare Dis, 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13023-020-1323-y
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  19. Management of birth defects and haemoglobin disorders: report of a joint WHO-March of Dimes meeting. (2006).
     Google Scholar
  20. Premarital Screening and Genetic Counseling program: knowledge, attitude, and satisfaction of attendees of governmental outpatient clinics in Jeddah. (2013). J Infect Public Health, 6, 41-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiph.2012.05.001
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  21. Public awareness of beta thalassemia in Bahrain. (2012). Bahrain Med Bull, 34.
     Google Scholar
  22. Public perceptions and attitudes toward thalassemia: influencing factors in a multi-racial population. (2011). BMC Public Health, 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-11-193
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  23. Screening and genetic diagnosis of haemoglobin disorders. (2003). Blood Rev, 17, 43-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0268-960x(02)00061-9
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  24. Strategies for the prevention of hereditary diseases in a highly consanguineous population. (2005). Ann Hum Biol, 32. https://doi.org/10.1080/03014460500075217
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  25. Thalassemia in Sri Lanka: a progress report. (2004). Hum Mol Genet, 13. https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddh250
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  26. Thalassemia: a prevalent disease yet unknown term among college students in Saudi Arabia. (2018). J Commun Genet, 9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12687-017-0351-3
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  27. The Clinical Approach to Thalassaemia. (1983). Grune and Stratton.
     Google Scholar
  28. The natural history and the national pre-marital screening program in Saudi Arabia. (2004). Saudi Med J, 25.
     Google Scholar
  29. The prevention of thalassemia. (2013). Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med, 3. https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a011775
    DOI  |   Google Scholar
  30. “Safe marriages” for thalassaemia prevention: a KAP survey in Sri Lanka. (2015). Transl Biomed, 6. https://doi.org/10.21767/2172-0479.100026
    DOI  |   Google Scholar